Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Flash953

(101 posts)
Tue Jan 28, 2025, 08:35 PM Jan 28

Insulin cap for medicare unaffected by trump order on prescription drug costs. I trust Reuters

There's no reason why DU should go wild and start believing things that aren't true. Everyone needs to slow down on this. There are probably other things to get worked up on but this is not one of them. Screw the jerk that started the Rumor.
Reuters fact check calls it misleading.
"The $35 insulin co-pay cap for certain Medicare plans is a provision in the Inflation Reduction Act and is not affected by President Trump’s reversal of a previous Biden executive order on prescription drug costs."

Here's the article.

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/insulin-cap-medicare-unaffected-by-trump-order-prescription-drug-costs-2025-01-28/

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Insulin cap for medicare unaffected by trump order on prescription drug costs. I trust Reuters (Original Post) Flash953 Jan 28 OP
K & R.., Lovie777 Jan 28 #1
"There's no reason why DU should go wild and start believing things that aren't true." Disaffected Jan 28 #2
In their defense iemanja Jan 28 #3
Read the executive orders. Ms. Toad Jan 28 #6
True dat but, Disaffected Jan 28 #8
Cat recipes for Springfield Ohio GusBob Jan 28 #4
All good points. Disaffected Jan 28 #7
Yup. Ms. Toad Jan 28 #5
I'm really glad people responded to my discussion Flash953 Jan 29 #9

Disaffected

(5,323 posts)
2. "There's no reason why DU should go wild and start believing things that aren't true."
Tue Jan 28, 2025, 08:48 PM
Jan 28

That is exactly the case but it sadly does not stop the FUD spreaders. Case in point, the insulin cap rumor was debunked here a day or two ago (in response to an OP claiming it was true) but that did not stop others from supporting & repeating it and, even IIRC complementing the OP as his/her post was apparently picked up by some politician or news outlet which in turn was portrayed here as a kudo for DU.

We have to do better than this or we will become our own worst enemies IMO.

iemanja

(55,404 posts)
3. In their defense
Tue Jan 28, 2025, 08:57 PM
Jan 28

It’s very hard to know what has and hasn’t been cut. That’s the result of the chaos Trump had imposed.

Ms. Toad

(35,851 posts)
6. Read the executive orders.
Tue Jan 28, 2025, 09:04 PM
Jan 28

Do a little research about the thing you are worried about
Refresh your basic Civics literacy

It is going to be hard enough to fight this crap, without having to spend so much of our time fact-checking rumors spread by folks on our side.

Disaffected

(5,323 posts)
8. True dat but,
Tue Jan 28, 2025, 09:25 PM
Jan 28

if the OP does not cite reliable source(s), best to assume the claim may well not be accurate.

The trick I guess is figuring out which sources are reliable and which are not - not admittedly an easy task these days what with the whorification of the MSM and the onslaught of republican propaganda.

GusBob

(7,688 posts)
4. Cat recipes for Springfield Ohio
Tue Jan 28, 2025, 09:01 PM
Jan 28

It’s very embarrassing when
——-folks fall over themselves for something fake
——-compound it by repeating it
——-don’t acknowledge their mistake when proven false
——-don’t see the truth in the replies and reply to the false below the truth
———you watch the recs climb into the 100’s after the debunking
——-the OP lets it all happen

It infuriates me. Is it a troll or what? It’s like a scam

Disaffected

(5,323 posts)
7. All good points.
Tue Jan 28, 2025, 09:15 PM
Jan 28

Especially "——-the OP lets it all happen"

Exactly. No retraction or clarification even after the claim is reliably debunked.

Another goodie is posting something controversial and not responding at all to replies (i.e. stir the sh*t then sit back & watch the fun).

Ms. Toad

(35,851 posts)
5. Yup.
Tue Jan 28, 2025, 09:01 PM
Jan 28

I debunked it in the thread - and yes, the OP in that thread was apparently quoted outside DU. The OP edited their post, but I assume the edit was after it was picked up by outside reporters.

The chaos is intentional and, as near as I can tell, it is being made worse by people who are afraid to cross Trump - and who are interpreting his orders more broadly than they are written. Like shutting off portals to HUD and Medicaid. Then our side, rather than reporting the facts, say things like he's terminated SNAP. He ended HUD. He took the price cap off insulin. Etc.

It is going to take months to sort out and effectively challenge all of the stuff he is doing that he has no authority to do - without having to fight all of the petrifying disinformation being spread as the gospel truth because it confirms our biases.

Flash953

(101 posts)
9. I'm really glad people responded to my discussion
Wed Jan 29, 2025, 06:38 PM
Jan 29

Thank you everyone for agreeing with me. There are credible sources out there. OPs need to be more diligent. I'm a part of this group to not go beserk over every little thing . I trust AP network news and Reuters.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Insulin cap for medicare ...