Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsZuckerberg lawyer skewers his 'toxic masculinity and Neo-Nazi madness' as he drops Meta as client
An attorney who previously represented Meta as a client has dropped the social media giant amid growing frustrations over the companys recent changes.
Mark Lemley, a Bay Area intellectual property attorney and Stanford Law School professor, had represented Meta in a proceeding over the companys alleged use of copyright texts for training artificial intelligence. The case, brought by a group of authors, could lead to precedent case law.
But Lemley couldnt rationalize what he called Facebooks descent into toxic masculinity and Neo-Nazi madness, he wrote on Bluesky.
On Monday, the attorney had been removed from the case and Metas roster. While Lemley believed his client was on the right side of the case, he said: I cannot in good conscience serve as their lawyer any longer. Meta allows allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation in posts as of last week, Lemley told SFGate.
Mark Lemley, a Bay Area intellectual property attorney and Stanford Law School professor, had represented Meta in a proceeding over the companys alleged use of copyright texts for training artificial intelligence. The case, brought by a group of authors, could lead to precedent case law.
But Lemley couldnt rationalize what he called Facebooks descent into toxic masculinity and Neo-Nazi madness, he wrote on Bluesky.
On Monday, the attorney had been removed from the case and Metas roster. While Lemley believed his client was on the right side of the case, he said: I cannot in good conscience serve as their lawyer any longer. Meta allows allegations of mental illness or abnormality when based on gender or sexual orientation in posts as of last week, Lemley told SFGate.
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/lawyer-fires-meta-client-zuckerberg-b2681064.html
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Zuckerberg lawyer skewers his 'toxic masculinity and Neo-Nazi madness' as he drops Meta as client (Original Post)
iemanja
Jan 18
OP
OAITW r.2.0
(29,568 posts)1. He's scared shitless about Trump. Think Putin power.
prodigitalson
(3,044 posts)2. ok I get the toxic part
Mike 03
(18,213 posts)3. Nice. Kicking for morning DUers.

BoRaGard
(4,411 posts)4. Submissive repube Brown Nosers are a sorry lot of entities
everyone says
B.See
(4,829 posts)5. I read an article that said
SUCKERberg would not be dropping fact checking for Brazil's Facebook for fear, apparently, that Brazil would be telling him to GFY just like they did Eloon.