You know, I don't have a problem with covering the 5 W's and H

[senseandsensibility]

(who, what, when, where, why, how) of the "alleged attempted assassination". It's fairly interesting and a significant news story.

What I object to is when it devolves into a disingenuous discussion about how dangerous the rhetoric is without admitting that the actual calls for violence are all on one side. It goes on for hours in this la-la land where both sides are to blame, and there is not even a hint that cheato himself has encouraged most of it.

Another apparently forbidden topic: there is only one side that enables this by encouraging and enabling people to buy high powered rifles.

[Clouds Passing]

1. The Rs are to blame fair and square.

[malaise]

2. Precisely

Rec