General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEditor of the National Review drops the N-word in interview
Link to tweet
Madeline Peltz
@peltzmadeline
·
Follow
Having a hard time coming to any conclusion besides the obvious one about what Rich Lowry catches himself blurting out here
11:12 AM · Sep 16, 2024
42 seconds in
dem4decades
(11,724 posts)underpants
(185,287 posts)I havent said that word since I was in the Army. It was a conscious decision I made. I used to say it a lot unfortunately, I just was stupid.
dem4decades
(11,724 posts)Ocelot II
(119,238 posts)such that it might slip out like some other inappropriate words - for example, it's possible that I might drop an F-bomb in the wrong situation because I use it from time to time in private. But since I don't drop the N-bomb even in private (or even think it), there's no chance I'd ever say it in public. If it's in your normal private vocabulary, though, sooner or later you'll slip and prove you're a racist asshole.
underpants
(185,287 posts)It enveloped me. My wife asked what I was watching and I said it. Ill never forget that.
Ninga
(8,501 posts)Nevilledog
(52,656 posts)Freethinker65
(10,778 posts)This should tank the National Review and Mr. Lowry. They always attempted to be the intellectual conservatives. This is really bad.
TwilightZone
(26,963 posts)They're just another right-wing tabloid at this point, hiding behind flowery language and false intellectualism.
If you really want some insight into how Trumpers and other conservatives currently view the world, read the comments for any NR article about Kamala Harris. They've lost their minds.
Freethinker65
(10,778 posts)They will no longer be able to pretend it is above racist MAGA bullshit.
TwilightZone
(26,963 posts)Conservatives have been pretending and insisting that they're not racists for as long as conservatives have been in existence. The denials have been particularly prevalent since the Civil Rights Era and bumped up a notch in the Reagan Era.
It went to new levels with Obama, of course, when the mantra became that racism no longer existed because we had a black president.
Nevilledog
(52,656 posts)Clouds Passing
(1,039 posts)It is their game plan, not an accident.
marble falls
(60,182 posts)misanthrope
(7,909 posts)Plenty of Americans prey on them.
marble falls
(60,182 posts)The List of Bird Species To Which the Migratory Bird Treaty Act Does Not Apply
The Migratory Bird Treaty Reform Act of 2004 (MBTRA) amended the MBTA by stating the MBTA applies only to migratory bird species that are native to the United States or U.S. territories, and that a native migratory bird species is one that is present as a result of natural biological or ecological processes. The MBTRA requires the Service to publish a list of all nonnative, human-introduced bird species to which the MBTA does not apply, and an updated list was published in 2020. The 2020 update identifies species belonging to biological families referred to in treaties the MBTA implements but are not protected because their presence in the United States or U.S. territories is solely the result of intentional or unintentional human-assisted introductions. It reflects the most current scientific information on taxonomy and natural.
Migratory Bird Permits
Regulations regarding migratory bird permits (50 CFR 21) provide information on permits for "the taking, possession, transportation, sale, purchase, barter, importation, exportation, and banding or marking of migratory birds. This part also provides certain exceptions to permit requirements for public, scientific, or educational institutions, and establishes depredation orders which provide limited exceptions to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act." The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Permit Program issues and maintains these permits through ePermits.
Citation
16 U.S.C. 703-712
https://www.fws.gov/media/list-birds-protected-migratory-bird-treaty-act-2023
You'll notice ducks are at the head of the list.
misanthrope
(7,909 posts)that Americans find predation of waterfowl to be culturally acceptable. The outrage at this would make it appear as if that acceptability only applies to certain demographic sets.
TwilightZone
(26,963 posts)WarGamer
(14,271 posts)Response to Nevilledog (Original post)
Freethinker65 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Think. Again.
(15,600 posts)Nevilledog
(52,656 posts)Think. Again.
(15,600 posts)I hope her malnutrition problem is nothing minor.
Nevilledog
(52,656 posts)Think. Again.
(15,600 posts)Montauk6
(8,257 posts)SoFlaBro
(3,013 posts)Ocelot II
(119,238 posts)Obviously he hasn't improved.