General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow to answer an assassination attempt
(Cross-posted from 'Humor' - this is a really good read, after the initial 'humor'.)https://the.ink/p/how-to-answer-an-assassination-attempt
A not so humorous analysis.
Every Unity Statement is different, but there are certain stylistic requirements that a Democratic political figure knows to follow.
First, the statement makers spouses name should be included prominently somewhere: Becky and I were sad to hear Corey and I were deeply shaken by the news Charlie and I join together The inclusion of the spouse is important here because it signals that this is a special kind of statement. More Christmas card vibes than political statement vibes. The normal rules are suspended. There will be no jabs here, no stridency, maybe not even any truth.
Second, the Unity Statement must deplore effects without naming or shaming their causes. Now is not the time for blaming someone for their role in contributing to what has finally now come around to imperil them, too. The Unity Statement thereby defies physics with its conception of uncaused effects; it defies botany in its vision of reaping with no connection whatever to sowing.
Third, a Democratic Unity Statement must mention temperature. Specifically, it should suggest that the temperature has risen too high. Though it may be Republicans who are overwhelmingly responsible for raising the temperature, planetarily and politically, in a respectable Unity Statement, this cannot be said. Instead, it should be argued that the temperature be lowered. Who knows how it got raised, and who really cares? And the Democratic statement maker must immediately volunteer to participate in the lowering of what they may have had no part in raising.
Fourth, the Unity Statement must, duh!, call for unity. Oh, and it must be unilateral unity. Unity, unmodified, is defined by Merriam-Webster as the quality or state of not being multiple, even a condition of harmony. The issuer of the Unity Statement knows that this aint gonna happen nationally. What the well-meaning Democratic leader means when they call for unity is that they want you, their followers, the people who would actually listen to a Democrats words, to engage in some unity making all by yourself. Reach out to an uncle you cut out of your life just because he made the honest mistake of degrading your very being at Thanksgiving; bake brownies for a neighbor whose only sin is flying a Trump flag plus the Aryan Nations tattoos. Go do some unity and dont wait for anyone else to join you. Dance like no ones watching, they say. Do unity like the other side isnt ever going to do it also.
Fifth, for extra credit on your Unity Statement, you can even go so far as to argue that unity now demands refraining from telling the truth about threats to democracy. We cant all get along if were busy pointing over there and yelling, That man is an existential threat to democracy! Its mean. So, as Democratic Congressman Jared Golden wrote in the aftermath of the attack on Trump, We can start by dropping hyperbolic threats about the stakes of this election. It should not be misleadingly portrayed as a struggle between democracy or authoritarianism, or a battle against fascists or socialists bent on destroying America.
More follows - the serious parts.
CoopersDad
(2,731 posts)I went on:
"I was riveted on the news about efforts to delay voting, to suppress same-day voters, and disqualify other voters, etc. in so many red states. This shooting or whatever at some golf course was a distraction from what we should all be talking about."
"Becky and I remain saddened and know that our friends and family feel the same way."
Kid Berwyn
(17,145 posts)Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine) really does seem mighty quick to jump on the Unity Bandwagon. Then maybe he just needs to know more of the story from The Ink:
Bemoan that Trump fell victim to a rifle attack, but also hold space for the idea that his fervent opposition to sensible gun reform has made it so much harder to protect him from this kind of occurrence. Of course, insist on a thorough investigation and pledge to follow the facts where they lead, but do not skip over the fact that Trumps assault on factual reality itself has made the country so much less capable of properly processing an event like this.