General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDaily Mail: Supreme Court leak exposes chief justice meddling in Trump's cases
Link to tweet
Supreme Court leak exposes chief justice meddling in Trump's cases https://mol.im/a/13853061 via @MailOnline
By Dominic Yeatman For Dailymail.Com
Published: 13:46 EDT, 15 September 2024 | Updated: 04:55 EDT, 16 September 2024
Chief Justice John Roberts strong-armed his fellow Supreme Court judges into allowing him the key role in cases involving Donald Trump, leaked memos reveal.
The conservative judge took the lead in Marchs case on whether states could remove the former president from their ballots over his role in the January 6 attack on the Capitol.
Roberts demanded a unanimous decision from the bench according to memos leaked to the New York Times.
He also took charge of the case concerning prosecution of the January 6 rioters himself from Justice Samuel Alito after his fellow conservative was embroiled in a row about his wife flying the Stars and Stripes upside down from their home.
/snip
SCOTUS reform NOW!
brush
(56,318 posts)the most UNWORTHY piece of shit ever to come onto the presidential scene in a century.
History won't be kind to them. And if they're successful in getting the orange turd elected, he won't be kind to them either.
They're supposed to be intelligent people. It's not hard to see that a second trump term will be the end of democracy here.
Do they actually think they can control him...especially since they gave him just about total immunity.
republianmushroom
(16,465 posts)Hugin
(34,299 posts)Federal Government?
We have to learn these things via leaks.
Who manages these records and where they are kept needs to be revealed.
AnotherMother4Peace
(4,581 posts)Blue Owl
(53,749 posts)Fuck these corrupt motherfuckers
LetMyPeopleVote
(151,967 posts)Here is a NYT article on Roberts' role is the SCOTUS efforts to help re-elect TFG. Roberts actions in these cases are really sickening and show that Robert and the other five conservatives have been actively attempting to help TFG in his legal issues. I have had issues with Roberts since the Shelby County case where Roberts gutted the voting rights act. Robert has now confirmed that he is a partisan hack.
This a NYT article that has some good facts. I think that the facts in this article show that Roberts is a partisan hack. The NYT does not go that far but provides enough facts to show that control of the SCOTUS is a key issue. This immunity ruling needs to be either overturned by adding more justices to the court or with the Presidential Immunity Act which contains a provision divesting SCOTUS with jurisdiction over this issue. The naked partisanship of the SCOTUS needs to be addressed if VP Harris wins and the Democrats have control over the Senate and the House.
Link to tweet
https://www.nytimes.com/subscription/onboarding-offer?EXIT_URI=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.nytimes.com%252F2024%252F09%252F15%252Fus%252Fjustice-roberts-trump-supreme-court.html%253Funlocked_article_code%253D1.K04.mC2X.k9K6vnKaQdt6%2526smid%253Dem-share&auth=login-google1tap&campaignId=7JFJX&login=google1tap
Former President Donald J. Trump, seeking to retake the White House, had made a bold, last-ditch appeal to the justices. He wanted them to block his fast-approaching criminal trial on charges of attempting to overturn the 2020 election, arguing that he was protected by presidential immunity. Whatever move the court made could have lasting consequences for the next election, the scope of presidential power and the courts own battered reputation......
The chief justice wrote the majority opinions in all three cases, including an unsigned one in March concluding that the former president could not be barred from election ballots in Colorado.
Another case involved a highly unusual switch. In April, the chief justice assigned Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. to write a majority opinion saying that prosecutors had gone too far in bringing obstruction charges against some Capitol rioters. But in late May, the chief justice took it over.
I read the immunity opinion and was shocked at how poorly reasoned such opinion was. This opinion looked like it was written by a non-lawyer like Stephen Miller. Robert's analysis was really weak. I am happy to see that I was not the only lawyer who was truly offended by Roberts' reasoning in the immunity opinion
But the public response to the decision, announced in July on the final day of the term, was nothing like what his lofty phrases seemed to anticipate.......
Its a strange, sprawling opinion, said William Baude, a University of Chicago law professor and a former clerk to the chief justice. Its hard to tell what exactly it is trying to do.
Others said the ruling was untethered from the law. Its certainly not really tied to the Constitution, said Stephen R. McAllister, a law professor at University of Kansas and former clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas.
Roberts has shown himself to be a partisan hack. The immunity ruling was really poorly reasoned and has the effect of making the POTUS into a king as noted by Justice Sotomayor
The courts leader shot back that the liberal justices strike a tone of chilling doom that is wholly disproportionate to what the court actually does today.
There at least two proposals pending to undo the immunity ruling that need to be addressed. Roberts proving himself to be a partisan hack makes control of the SCOTUS a key issue this cycle.