General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAbortion Bans Have Delayed Emergency Medical Care. In Georgia, Experts Say This Mother's Death Was Preventable.
Abortion Bans Have Delayed Emergency Medical Care. In Georgia, Experts Say This Mothers Death Was Preventable.
At least two women in Georgia died after they couldnt access legal abortions and timely medical care in their state, ProPublica has found. This is one of their stories.
by Kavitha Surana
Sept. 16, 5 a.m. EDT
ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as theyre published.
In her final hours, Amber Nicole Thurman suffered from a grave infection that her suburban Atlanta hospital was well-equipped to treat.
Shed taken abortion pills and encountered a rare complication; she had not expelled all of the fetal tissue from her body. She showed up at Piedmont Henry Hospital in need of a routine procedure to clear it from her uterus, called a dilation and curettage, or D&C.
But just that summer, her state had made performing the procedure a felony, with few exceptions. Any doctor who violated the new Georgia law could be prosecuted and face up to a decade in prison.
Thurman waited in pain in a hospital bed, worried about what would happen to her 6-year-old son, as doctors monitored her infection spreading, her blood pressure sinking and her organs beginning to fail.
It took 20 hours for doctors to finally operate. By then, it was too late.
more...
https://www.propublica.org/article/georgia-abortion-ban-amber-thurman-death
Ilsa
(62,091 posts)had malpractice insurance or not.
Lovie777
(14,025 posts)sheshe2
(86,068 posts)If they had performed the procedure when she was admitted to the hospital she would have lived and they would have faced a decade in prison? So instead they waited 20 hours, watched her suffering and dying which is against every oath a doctor takes, to finally perform the procedure. So in the end they willfully followed a law, let her die and they face no charges of murder.
Make this make sense.
yardwork
(63,362 posts)Her six year old son lost his mother because a hospital let her die, on purpose.
sheshe2
(86,068 posts)Yes, sue the hospital and also sue the people that are making these draconian laws!
evolves
(5,556 posts)The choice is prison and permanent loss of the ability to practice medicine versus malpractice and a lifetime of anguish knowing you could have provided care but didnt.
How would you handle that Catch-22?
WhiskeyGrinder
(23,361 posts)Some find ways to perform lifesaving procedures. Some are organizing to help others find ways to perform these procedures and develop strategies to protect themselves legally. It all depends on what side someone wants to be on.
evolves
(5,556 posts)However, most of us are fighting tooth and nail to keep our patients safe.
Most of us take this very seriously.
WhiskeyGrinder
(23,361 posts)evolves
(5,556 posts)with draconian abortion bans.
Solly Mack
(91,710 posts)professionals (and others who offer help to women).
Control.
Clouds Passing
(1,039 posts)Im deeply sorry you had to endure such a lack of compassion and humanity
yardwork
(63,362 posts)flying_wahini
(7,714 posts)Such horrible people to follow the law but leave a woman to die. Its such a simple procedure.
evolves
(5,556 posts)you lose your ability to earn a living AND your freedom.
Its a HORRIBLE choice to make.
tinrobot
(11,353 posts)When the state decides to insert itself into a doctor's medical decisions, they also have to take responsibility for the medical consequences.
evolves
(5,556 posts)To date, such attempts have gone nowhere.
joshcryer
(62,329 posts)It's about 20 a year. Who will die. Because of Trump and the SCOTUS. That's only including those who would die due to non-abortive care. It does not include the many many women whose lives are upended by unintended pregnancies and forced birth (who may live short term but whose lives will be damaged irreparably by an unwanted child). I couldn't think of a way to make that calculation. I simply did the calculation for mortality and the number of new expected pregnancies. We aren't going to know the full impact for a few years but it likely going to be hundreds of dead women due to this (only way to see that is to wait for the stats to come in).
This is an incalculable tragedy and I fear it will not be reversed until we have a serious case of a very public death by a young woman who is begging for her life with no one to help her: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Savita_Halappanavar
4catsmom
(52 posts)so mission accomplished for Georgia nazis.
Botany
(71,785 posts)We are looking at a massive blue wave. Do not be surprised if some really red states
flip this fall. Think of all those good white Christian Housewives in their comfortable
suburban homes who back in the day had abortions or had friends and or family that
needed them.
Freedom of Religion also means freedom from Religion too.
Amber Nicole Thurman Is going along for the ride with millions of voters this fall.
Timeflyer
(2,468 posts)NONE.
TommieMommy
(629 posts)This is the exact problem that Kamala was talking about, women suffering and bleeding out, all the complications that can happen. I've never dispised anyone in my life like I do him that piece of 💩
Figarosmom
(714 posts)Taken by ambulance or helicopter yo a place they could do a d&c w/o going to prison? If it was her heart or any other operation that's what they would do.
So can men still legally get a vasectomy ? Isn't that what they would call killing babies since that's what they say about birth control. I remember in the 60 sand 70s women who wNted hystrectomies were denied because it was morally wrong in the opinion of the powers that be.
evolves
(5,556 posts)NOT the insurance company, so it wont happen.
Zilli
(244 posts)electric_blue68
(16,852 posts)I'm thinking compliant women are not considered a problem.
Quanto Magnus
(975 posts)should be charged with reckless endangerment.